ASCENTLEARNING
Join a weekly class
Skip to learning content
Year 8 · Algebraic expressions · 13 min

Equivalent linear expressions

Compare linear expressions using valid algebraic transformations and distinguish equivalence from one matching value.

01 / LEARN

The idea, step by step

Equivalent for every allowed input

Expressions are equivalent if they have the same value for every allowed input. The distributive property makes 2⁢(x+3) and 2⁢x+6 equivalent. We can use either form without changing the relationship.

Expand brackets and collect like terms in both expressions. If both simplify to the same form, the steps justify equivalence. A bracketed form can show groups while an expanded form makes coefficients easier to compare.

A match is not a proof

The expressions 2⁢x+1 and 3⁢x both equal 3 at x=1. At x=2, however, they give 5 and 6, so they are not equivalent. One permitted input with different outputs is a counterexample.

A single matching input can be a coincidence. To establish an identity, use transformations valid for all inputs. To disprove one, state the input clearly and show both resulting values.

A common trap

Calling two expressions equivalent after checking just one input.

Instead: Use valid algebra to show agreement for every input; one matching value cannot establish that.

02 / WORKED EXAMPLES

See the thinking

Example 1

Show two forms agree

Show that 4⁢(x+2)−x and 3⁢x+8 are equivalent.

  1. Expand to 4⁢x+8−x.
  2. Collect to get 3⁢x+8.
  3. The two forms are identical.
Equivalent for every x.
Example 2

Find a counterexample

Are 2⁢x+4 and 4⁢x+2 equivalent?

  1. Use x=0.
  2. The outputs are 4 and 2.
  3. One unequal pair disproves equivalence.
No; x=0 is a counterexample.

Check your understanding

Is 3⁢(x+2)+x equivalent to 4⁢x+6?

Show answer

Yes.

Expansion and collection give 3⁢x+6+x=4⁢x+6.

03 / WORKSHEET

Your turn

6 questions · 14 marks · Work at your own pace.

Read the questions online
  1. Show that 2⁢(x+5) and 2⁢x+10 are equivalent.
    2 marks
  2. Show that 5⁢x+3⁢x−4 and 8⁢x−4 are equivalent.
    2 marks
  3. Is 3⁢(x−2) equivalent to 3⁢x−2? Give a counterexample.
    2 marks
  4. Simplify 6⁢(x+1)−2⁢x and compare with 4⁢x+6.
    2 marks
  5. Why is checking 2⁢x+1 and 3⁢x only at x=1 not enough?
    3 marks
  6. Give an expanded expression and a factorised expression equivalent to 12⁢x+8.
    3 marks
Read the worked solutions

Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.

  1. Show that 2⁢(x+5) and 2⁢x+10 are equivalent.
    2 marks

    Distribute 2 to get 2⁢x+10.

    Equivalent.
  2. Show that 5⁢x+3⁢x−4 and 8⁢x−4 are equivalent.
    2 marks

    Collect 5⁢x+3⁢x=8⁢x.

    Equivalent.
  3. Is 3⁢(x−2) equivalent to 3⁢x−2? Give a counterexample.
    2 marks

    Evaluate both at the same permitted input.

    No; at x=0 the outputs are −6 and −2.
  4. Simplify 6⁢(x+1)−2⁢x and compare with 4⁢x+6.
    2 marks

    Expand to 6⁢x+6−2⁢x.

    Collect to get 4⁢x+6.

    They are equivalent.
  5. Why is checking 2⁢x+1 and 3⁢x only at x=1 not enough?
    3 marks

    Equivalence means all allowed inputs, not just one.

    They match there but differ at x=2, where the values are 5 and 6.
  6. Give an expanded expression and a factorised expression equivalent to 12⁢x+8.
    3 marks

    Split or collect like terms without changing the value.

    Extract common factor 4.

    For example, 8⁢x+4⁢x+8 and 4⁢(3⁢x+2).
Checking saved progress…

Continue learning

Rearranging simple formulas

Next lesson
Curriculum reference & lesson scope

Australian Curriculum v9 Mathematics with SA curriculum context

Combining like terms; substitution with signed/rational values; multiplying/dividing algebraic terms; expanding a single bracket; factorising common factors; equivalent linear expressions; rearranging simple formulas.

Official curriculum source ↗
Back to Algebraic expressions

Save your next step.

Create a free account to save your learning progress. Lessons and downloads stay free, with or without an account.

Create free account