The idea, step by step
One matching input is not enough
Equivalent expressions give the same value for every input allowed by both forms. and are equivalent because the distributive law connects them.
and both give 6 when , but give 2 and 4 when . Agreement at one input proves only agreement there, not equivalence for all inputs.
| x | 2x | x + 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 3 | 6 | 6 |
| 5 | 10 | 8 |
Prove or disprove appropriately
To prove an equivalence, transform one expression into the other using valid algebra, or simplify both to the same form. Explain the operations rather than joining unrelated expressions with equals signs.
One permitted input giving different values is enough to disprove equivalence. This is a counterexample. A finite table can suggest an identity, but cannot by itself establish equality for every real input. Check any denominator restrictions before choosing a test value.
A common trap
Treating one successful numerical test as proof of an identity.
Instead: An algebraic argument supports a universal claim; a counterexample can disprove it.
See the thinking
Prove equivalence
Are and equivalent?
- Expand: .
- Collect constants: .
- This equals the second expression for every real .
Find a counterexample
Test the claim that and are equivalent.
- Choose the permitted input .
- The first expression gives and the second gives .
- They differ, so the claim is false. The correct expansion is .
Check your understanding
Are and equivalent?
Show answer
Yes.
for every real .
Your turn
6 questions · 14 marks · Work at your own pace.
Read the questions online
- Are and equivalent? Explain.2 marks
- Are and equivalent? Give a counterexample if not.2 marks
- Show is equivalent to .2 marks
- Are and equivalent? Explain.2 marks
- Two expressions agree at . Explain why this does not prove equivalence, using your own pair.3 marks
- Show and are equivalent. Is allowed?3 marks
Read the worked solutions
Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.
- Are and equivalent? Explain.2 marks
for all .
Yes. - Are and equivalent? Give a counterexample if not.2 marks
but .
No; gives 6 and 2. - Show is equivalent to .2 marks
.
Both simplify to . - Are and equivalent? Explain.2 marks
Expanding the second expression gives .
Yes. - Two expressions agree at . Explain why this does not prove equivalence, using your own pair.3 marks
At both give 4.
At the values are 2 and 0, so they are not equivalent.
For example, and agree at 2 but differ at 0. - Show and are equivalent. Is allowed?3 marks
because 4 is non-zero.
The denominator does not contain .
They are equivalent, including at .
Curriculum reference & lesson scope
Australian Curriculum v9 / SA Curriculum
Year 9 algebraic simplification and equivalent expressions, with consolidation of linear formula skills. Binomial expansion and quadratic factorisation/equations are in the separate Quadratics and Parabolas chapter.
Official curriculum source ↗