ASCENTLEARNING
Join a weekly class
Skip to learning content
Year 12 · Sampling and confidence intervals · 20 min

Assessing claims and limitations

Evaluate what an interval supports and what the study cannot establish.

01 / LEARN

The idea, step by step

Start with the claim

Identify the target population and time, sampling frame, parameter and method before looking at narrowness. Correct arithmetic does not justify generalising beyond the study design. A parameter inside an interval is compatible with that procedure, not proved exactly true.

If a proposed value lies outside an interval, describe evidence against compatibility under the assumptions rather than declaring impossible certainty. Model failure and bias remain possible explanations.

State limits the margin does not cover

A usual margin quantifies sampling variation, not measurement error, dishonest answers, incomplete frames or selective reporting. A statistically precise tiny difference may be practically irrelevant to the decision.

Overlapping intervals for two groups are not a formal test of equality. The difference needs its own inferential model. Describe the separate estimates honestly and avoid conclusions the analysis has not justified.

A common trap

Inside the interval means proved true.

Instead: It means compatible with the interval procedure, subject to assumptions.

02 / WORKED EXAMPLES

See the thinking

Example 1

Compatible does not mean proved

A 95% mean-fill interval is (497.8,501.2) mL. Evaluate “this proves the mean is exactly 500 mL”.

  1. 500 is inside the interval, but many other values are too.
  2. The conclusion also depends on the sampling, measurement and model assumptions.
500 mL is compatible, not proved.
Example 2

Narrow but biased

An app poll reports 62% support with a one-percentage-point margin and claims to describe all residents. What needs checking?

  1. A large count can make a computed interval narrow.
  2. It does not ensure app users or volunteers represent all residents.
The frame, selection, response process and target population.

Check your understanding

Does a 95% interval (0.46,0.54) establish a majority?

Show answer

No.

It includes values on both sides of 0.5.

03 / WORKSHEET

Your turn

6 questions · 12 marks · Work at your own pace.

Read the questions online
  1. A 95% mean interval is (21,25). Is target mean 23 compatible? Is it proved?
    2 marks
  2. A 95% proportion interval is (0.56,0.64). Give a cautious majority statement.
    2 marks
  3. A researcher reports only the narrowest interval from 20 post-hoc exclusions. What is wrong?
    2 marks
  4. Two group mean intervals overlap. Why is “the means are equal” unjustified?
    2 marks
  5. A mean difference is precisely estimated at 0.02 mm. What else matters in an engineering decision?
    2 marks
  6. A 2024 survey is used to claim a 2026 preference. Give a limitation.
    2 marks
Read the worked solutions

Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.

  1. A 95% mean interval is (21,25). Is target mean 23 compatible? Is it proved?
    2 marks

    23 lies inside a range containing other plausible means.

    Compatible, not proved.
  2. A 95% proportion interval is (0.56,0.64). Give a cautious majority statement.
    2 marks

    Every interval value is above 0.5; do not claim certainty.

    It supports a population proportion above 0.5 under the study assumptions.
  3. A researcher reports only the narrowest interval from 20 post-hoc exclusions. What is wrong?
    2 marks

    The final selection is not the same as a pre-specified repeated procedure.

    Selective analysis can undermine the advertised coverage.
  4. Two group mean intervals overlap. Why is “the means are equal” unjustified?
    2 marks

    Separate intervals estimate separate parameters, not their difference directly.

    Overlap does not establish equality; a difference needs its own model.
  5. A mean difference is precisely estimated at 0.02 mm. What else matters in an engineering decision?
    2 marks

    Statistical precision is not practical importance.

    Whether that difference matters relative to tolerances, risk and cost.
  6. A 2024 survey is used to claim a 2026 preference. Give a limitation.
    2 marks

    Define the original population and time; later generalisation needs justification.

    The population preference may have changed.
Checking saved progress…

Ready for the topic test?

Review the chapter, then choose a practice test.

Topic review
Curriculum reference & lesson scope

SACE Board of South Australia

Stage 2 Mathematical Methods: sampling distributions and confidence intervals for means and proportions. Mean tasks distinguish known population spread from sufficiently large-sample estimated-spread normal intervals. Repeated-interval computational simulation, approximation conditions, design and interpretation are included.

Official curriculum source ↗
Back to Sampling and confidence intervals

Save your next step.

Create a free account to save your learning progress. Lessons and downloads stay free, with or without an account.

Create free account