ASCENTLEARNING
Join a weekly class
Skip to learning content
Year 11 · Proof and circle geometry · 18 min

Statements, implication, converse and equivalence

Separate an assumption from a conclusion, then decide whether a converse or an equivalence is justified.

01 / LEARN

The idea, step by step

Read the direction of the claim

A mathematical statement has a truth value once its variables and domain are specified. In an implication P⇒Q, P is the assumption and Q is what must follow whenever P holds. The implication does not say that P always happens.

For example, on the integers, being a multiple of four guarantees being even. It is enough to begin with an arbitrary multiple of four and show that it is twice an integer. Testing a few multiples illustrates the idea but does not prove the universal claim.

Reverse carefully

The converse of P⇒Q is Q⇒P. A converse needs its own argument and can be false even when the original statement is true. A counterexample must satisfy the converse assumption while failing its conclusion.

Write P⇔Q only after both directions are established. This means that P is both sufficient and necessary for Q. State the domain: a claim about positive real numbers may fail for negative numbers.

A common trap

Using the same proof to claim the converse automatically.

Instead: Write the converse separately and either prove it or produce a counterexample.

02 / WORKED EXAMPLES

See the thinking

Example 1

A true implication and a false converse

For an integer n, consider: if n is divisible by 4, then n is even. Prove it and test its converse.

  1. Write n=4⁢k for an integer k.
  2. Then n=2⁢(2⁢k), so n is even.
  3. The converse would claim every even integer is divisible by 4. The integer 6 is even but not divisible by 4.
The implication is true; the converse is false.
Example 2

An equivalence

For an integer n, prove that n is odd if and only if n+1 is even.

  1. If n=2⁢k+1, then n+1=2⁢(k+1) is even.
  2. Conversely, if n+1=2⁢k, then n=2⁢(k−1)+1 is odd.
  3. Both directions use integer parameters, so both are valid on the stated domain.
n odd ⇔n+1 even.

Check your understanding

State the converse of: if x>3, then x>1.

Show answer

If x>1, then x>3.

The converse is false, for example at x=2.

03 / WORKSHEET

Your turn

6 questions · 14 marks · Work at your own pace.

Read the questions online
  1. State the assumption and conclusion in: if an integer is divisible by 10, it is divisible by 5.
    2 marks
  2. Prove that every multiple of 6 is a multiple of 3.
    2 marks
  3. Write the converse of the claim in Question 2 and give a counterexample.
    2 marks
  4. For real x, test both directions of x=2⇒x2=4.
    2 marks
  5. For real x, prove x=0⇔x2=0.
    3 marks
  6. Is “n is a multiple of 12” sufficient, necessary, both or neither for “n is a multiple of 4”, on the integers?
    3 marks
Read the worked solutions

Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.

  1. State the assumption and conclusion in: if an integer is divisible by 10, it is divisible by 5.
    2 marks

    The condition after “if” is assumed. The statement after “then” must be established.

    Assumption: divisible by 10. Conclusion: divisible by 5.
  2. Prove that every multiple of 6 is a multiple of 3.
    2 marks

    Write n=6⁢k=3⁢(2⁢k) for k∈ℤ. Since 2⁢k is an integer, 3∣n.

    True.
  3. Write the converse of the claim in Question 2 and give a counterexample.
    2 marks

    3 is divisible by 3 but not by 6.

    Every multiple of 3 is a multiple of 6; false at 3.
  4. For real x, test both directions of x=2⇒x2=4.
    2 marks

    Substitution gives 22=4.

    For the converse, x=−2 has x2=4 but x≠2.

    The original is true; the converse is false.
  5. For real x, prove x=0⇔x2=0.
    3 marks

    If x=0, squaring gives 0.

    If x2=0, then x⋅x=0, so the zero-product property gives x=0.

    Both directions hold.
  6. Is “n is a multiple of 12” sufficient, necessary, both or neither for “n is a multiple of 4”, on the integers?
    3 marks

    Every 12⁢k=4⁢(3⁢k) is divisible by 4.

    The number 4 is divisible by 4 but not by 12.

    Sufficient but not necessary.
Checking saved progress…

Continue learning

Counterexamples

Next lesson
Curriculum reference & lesson scope

SACE Board of South Australia

Stage 1 Mathematics: geometric reasoning and real-number/proof material, regrouped into a school chapter; all exercises are original.

Official curriculum source ↗
Back to Proof and circle geometry

Save your next step.

Create a free account to save your learning progress. Lessons and downloads stay free, with or without an account.

Create free account